Right now, it is important to engage with these criticisms honestly in order to improve these practices moving forward. The beginning of diversity initiatives is often linked to the civil rights act of 1964, signed into law, following slavery, segregation, and jim crow laws, by us president lyndon b. ยท given how divisive dei is in the u. s. ยท dei โ€™ s decline signals a broader societal reckoning with identity politics and ideological overreach. Why is dei declining? ยท dei offices accomplish little more than producing a lot of bureaucratic sound and fury on the taxpayersโ€™ dime. ยท despite their commitments to equity, many dei programs in these sectors fail to address wage gaps, job security, and career mobility for frontline and entry level workers. Are dei training and practices detrimental to our business? Thanks to our efforts and the work others are doing in this area, the harmful impacts of dei and esg initiatives are being exposed, forcing corporations to reconsider their priorities. ยท hereโ€™s the short answer: Opponents argue dei can undermine meritocracy, impose perceived preferential treatment, and become a vehicle for ideological enforcement, while supporters point to research linking diversity programs to better business outcomes and talent retention. Below are some key themes from jussimโ€™s review, along with a link to read the whole thing. The modern anti- dei backlash is really about resegregation and white supremacy. ยท dei is considered โ€œ bad โ€ by critics for a mix of practical, political and cultural reasons: Does dei have a lasting impact? The racial problems in schools remain โ€œastronomical,โ€ according to federal.